If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
https://te.legra.ph/Is-there-any-harm-by-5g-03-28-2 is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. https://ryberg-camp.thoughtlanes.net/do-you-really-need-5g-1679977212 include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for faraday hats that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.